UFO Sightings, Videos, Pictures, Documentaries & Movies

UFO Sightings | UFO Videos | UFO Pictures | UFO Documentaries | UFO Movies


low altitude ufo sighting in south of france – steady shot


Published by Prichard, on November 1st, 2007 at 6:07 am. Filled under: UFO. | 10 Comments |

10 Responses to “low altitude ufo sighting in south of france – steady shot”

  1. This is interesting

    Comment by spencer2800 on November 1, 2007 at 6:53 am



  2. what is that weird black frame :S

    Comment by 9milNL on November 1, 2007 at 7:47 am



  3. Black frame? That is the image stabalizer. It does that when you take out the shaking. The UFO stays still while the frame moves.

    Comment by TheVanDyke on November 1, 2007 at 6:26 am



  4. was it real?

    Comment by poplocker0302 on November 1, 2007 at 6:07 am



  5. Oh come on! Fake!This footage has been proof is fake at World Ufo Conference few month ago!

    Comment by stevenng2020 on November 1, 2007 at 7:31 am



  6. Alright, but you mean these footages. There are several footages. Those that are stationary are hard to prove they are fake. The World Ufo Conference would at least release these footages with sophisticated filters and motion tracking for all to see to gain credibility.

    Comment by TheVanDyke on November 1, 2007 at 8:02 am



  7. I attend the Conference, even Jammie say this is fake video, there have make a video explain how and the people who make it. I will make my own video about this footage “fake ufo 4″ soon.

    Comment by stevenng2020 on November 1, 2007 at 8:28 am



  8. If you make your video, you might want to explain how the birds fly around the craft at 1:19. Although the ones at time 0-0:35 can be done on a computer but what evidence can prove that it’s a fake? From my perspective, a proof of a fake is found on 0-0:04. The object is moving out-of-sync with the screen.

    Comment by TheVanDyke on November 1, 2007 at 8:15 am



  9. A few of them may be real.

    Comment by TheVanDyke on November 1, 2007 at 7:17 am



  10. Es una mancha en el lente de la cámara

    Comment by coyoxi on November 1, 2007 at 7:06 am



Leave a Reply